March 27, 2025
Medical Registries explained: The hidden key to healthier nation an interview with Prof Richard Page.
The player is loading ...
The silent revolution happening in healthcare often goes unnoticed by patients, but medical registries have fundamentally transformed how medicine is practiced—particularly in orthopaedic surgery.Join Dr Gavin Nimon ( Host and Orthopaedic Surgeon ) as he interviews Professor Richard Page and they pull back the curtain on these powerful databases that track surgical outcomes across entire populations.
As the former Deputy Director of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Professor Page reveals how these systems have saved approximately $1.2 billion in healthcare costs while dramatically improving patient outcomes. The Australian registry, considered world-class, has tracked over 2.2 million joint replacements with extraordinary detail and accuracy exceeding 99%.
What began with passionate surgeons manually recording data has evolved into sophisticated systems that provide early warning signals when implants underperform. Professor Page shares the fascinating story of how shoulder replacements were integrated into the national registry—initially by surgeons who simply crossed out "knee" on data collection forms and wrote "shoulder" instead. This persistence paid off, with shoulder replacements growing from approximately 1,000 annually to nearly 12,000, making it the fastest-growing joint replacement procedure in Australia.
The registry has revealed crucial insights: total shoulder replacements outperform partial replacements for osteoarthritis, and reverse shoulder replacements have proven remarkably successful despite initial skepticism. These findings directly influence surgical decisions and have reduced revision rates by nearly 4%, sparing hundreds of patients from additional operations.
Looking forward, Professor Page describes an exciting future where registries integrate with AI, smartphone technology, and wearables to provide real-time monitoring of patient function. These powerful databases are evolving from quality assurance tools into platforms for innovative research, international collaboration, and personalized medicine.
Explore this fascinating conversation to understand how systematic data collection is quietly revolutionizing healthcare delivery and improving lives. What other medical advances might be hiding in plain sight within these vast repositories of patient data?
Aussie Med Ed is sponsored by -HealthShare is a digital health company, that provides solutions for patients, General Practitioners and Specialists across Australia.
Aussie Med Ed is sponsored by Avant Medical Indemnity: They state that they offer holistic support to help the doctor practice safely and believe they have extensive cover that's continually evolving to meet your needs in the ever changing regulatory environment.
WEBVTT
00:00:00.349 --> 00:00:08.220
Medical registries are transforming health care, silently working behind the scenes to track outcomes, refine surgical technique and influence policy.
00:00:08.710 --> 00:00:23.420
In orthopaedics, registries like the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, have revolutionised the way we understand joint replacement surgeries, improving patient care by identifying trends, successes and areas for improvement.
00:00:23.969 --> 00:00:25.940
But how exactly do these registries work?
00:00:26.370 --> 00:00:30.460
What impact have they had on orthopaedic practice, particularly in shoulder and joint arthroplasty?
00:00:31.068 --> 00:00:36.069
And with the rise of AI and predictive analytics, what does the future hold for these powerful databases?
00:00:36.899 --> 00:00:42.469
Today we're diving deep into the world of registries, exploring their origins, challenges and future developments.
00:00:42.984 --> 00:00:50.734
Whether you're a medical student, general practitioner, or surgeon, this episode will shed light on a critical yet often overlooked aspect of modern medicine.
00:00:50.784 --> 00:00:52.314
Good day and welcome to Aussie MedEd.
00:00:52.435 --> 00:01:02.904
The Aussie style Medical podcast a pragmatic and relaxed medical podcast designed for medical students and general practitioners where we explore relevant and practical medical topics with expert specialists.
00:01:03.875 --> 00:01:12.043
Hosted by myself, Gavin Nimon, an orthopaedic surgeon, this podcast provides insightful discussions to enhance your clinical knowledge without unnecessary jargon.
00:01:12.635 --> 00:01:18.194
I'd like to start the podcast by acknowledging the Kaurna people as the traditional custodians of the land on which this podcast is produced.
00:01:18.564 --> 00:01:24.763
I'd like to pay my respects to the elders, both past, present, and emerging, and recognizing their ongoing connection to land, waters, and culture.
00:01:24.763 --> 00:01:28.543
this podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.
00:01:28.864 --> 00:01:40.834
Always refer to clinical guidelines and consult a qualified healthcare professional before making medical decisions Joining me is Professor Richard Page, a renowned orthopaedic shoulder and upper limb surgeon based in Geelong, Victoria.
00:01:41.453 --> 00:01:51.243
He's the Foundation Chair of Orthopaedics at Deakin University, Director of Orthopaedic Research at Barwon Health, and has played a significant role in the AOA National Joint Replacement Registry.
00:01:51.243 --> 00:02:06.808
With over 150 publications, leadership roles in multiple orthopaedic research organizations and extensive contributions to arthroplasty registries, Richard is the perfect guide to help us navigate this fascinating topic Well, it gives me great pleasure to introduce Professor Richard Page.
00:02:06.998 --> 00:02:09.717
Richard's a professor in orthopaedics at Deakin University.
00:02:10.048 --> 00:02:12.237
He's the president of the Shoulder and Elbow Society.
00:02:12.247 --> 00:02:15.548
And his accolades would need another podcast just to read out.
00:02:15.848 --> 00:02:19.448
But most importantly, I would describe him as one of the most pleasant and humble surgeons I know.
00:02:20.258 --> 00:02:24.609
Richard, it's great to have you on board on Aussie Med Ed and talk about this really important topic.
00:02:24.614 --> 00:02:25.304
Thanks, Gavin.
00:02:25.304 --> 00:02:27.924
It's a pleasure to be here and very generous introduction.
00:02:28.373 --> 00:02:28.913
Appreciate it.
00:02:29.063 --> 00:02:29.813
No worries.
00:02:29.813 --> 00:02:44.253
I would say that you do have a bit of interest in this, in that you are actually the past deputy director to the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, and also on the committee for the Victorian Orthopedic Trauma Outcome Registry.
00:02:44.554 --> 00:02:47.943
So you've got a bit of experience in registries and talking about the importance of them.
00:02:48.424 --> 00:02:51.663
Perhaps we could start off by asking, what's the primary purpose of a registry?
00:02:51.663 --> 00:02:52.114
For
00:02:52.213 --> 00:02:53.294
yeah, good question.
00:02:53.294 --> 00:02:56.493
I guess that's the fundamental question is the why, because there's a lot of.
00:02:56.824 --> 00:03:00.993
Time, effort, energy involved in running registries, and there's obviously cost as well.
00:03:01.653 --> 00:03:09.633
But the principle point of having them and why we have developed them and thrown our weight into them in Australia is for quality improvement.
00:03:10.324 --> 00:03:19.473
So at the end of the day, to collect large national population data sets that can improve patient outcomes, that's what it's all about.
00:03:19.963 --> 00:03:26.998
Giving people , that need the information, the right information to make the right decisions, to do the right thing by patients.
00:03:27.329 --> 00:03:29.674
And that covers a whole range of registries.
00:03:29.883 --> 00:03:42.834
Obviously our area of interest is orthopedics, in particular joint replacements, but there's a range of registries both in Australia and globally that have been shown to be, very effective and in fact very cost effective.
00:03:43.334 --> 00:03:46.443
Perhaps you could actually go through the type of registries that you are aware of,?
00:03:46.264 --> 00:03:46.443
Prof Richard Page: Yeah.
00:03:46.443 --> 00:03:46.774
Okay.
00:03:46.774 --> 00:03:55.979
Let's, maybe if I start with the ones that I'm involved in and I can talk,'cause obviously that's an outline of what I know best, but , I'm certainly aware of others as you've suggested.
00:03:55.979 --> 00:04:04.618
So the big one for us as orthopedic surgeons nationally in Australia and jewel in the crown as it's often referred to as the National Joint Replacement Registry.
00:04:04.618 --> 00:04:15.283
And that's been running for over 25 years now and has had a major impact on both our practice as, surgeons and , our measured outcomes in terms of revision rates.
00:04:15.283 --> 00:04:16.394
So that's probably the big one.
00:04:16.814 --> 00:04:24.454
There are a number of other registries you alluded to, the Trauma Outcome Registry, which is a sentinel registry looking at orthopedic trauma outcomes in Victoria.
00:04:25.074 --> 00:04:27.574
And there's been some smaller regional ones.
00:04:27.634 --> 00:04:33.423
We've got a regional joint replacement registry in Geelong, which has also been running for over 25 years now.
00:04:34.098 --> 00:04:37.079
It collects similar but some different data.
00:04:37.288 --> 00:04:38.728
So these are all complimentary.
00:04:38.968 --> 00:04:40.019
They're not competing.
00:04:40.019 --> 00:04:46.315
They sit well together 'cause they have slightly different flavors or look in some instances different attributes.
00:04:46.716 --> 00:04:55.526
And then we've got an even smaller but soft tissue registry that looks at the outcomes of in my and your Gavin area of interest around the shoulder and upper limb.
00:04:55.625 --> 00:05:03.696
Looks at particular things like rotator cuff problems, shoulder instability, other painful shoulder conditions like frozen shoulder.
00:05:03.696 --> 00:05:05.555
No one registry can do everything.
00:05:05.586 --> 00:05:07.776
And different registries have a slightly different favor.
00:05:07.776 --> 00:05:11.625
So that's probably the, orthopedic ones that are well known to me and us.
00:05:11.625 --> 00:05:13.425
But then there's the really other important ones.
00:05:13.966 --> 00:05:21.605
Things are like other device registries in the country that have picked up problematic things like breast implants cancer registries.
00:05:22.086 --> 00:05:37.386
Both soft tissue, musculoskeletal, and they're really important, particularly when you're looking at rare and uncommon events where no one surgeon or no one center may have enough data to be able to provide sensible interpretation of outcomes.
00:05:37.865 --> 00:05:39.471
So these are the sort of things that we see.
00:05:39.636 --> 00:05:45.815
And then there's respiratory ones, there's renal disease ones, there's urology ones, there's general surgical ones.
00:05:45.935 --> 00:05:47.555
So they have grown hugely.
00:05:47.975 --> 00:05:53.656
And this mirrors really what's happening globally so Australia's not the only country that's doing it.
00:05:53.656 --> 00:05:54.706
It's all around the world.
00:05:55.206 --> 00:05:56.375
Yeah, look, it is.
00:05:56.375 --> 00:06:00.675
And obviously you need to have good infrastructure for them to work.
00:06:00.675 --> 00:06:09.526
You need to have some support for data collection, ideally, government, local or national government support, because there is a cost in running these.
00:06:10.076 --> 00:06:16.516
It has actually, it's a, bit of a classic line now is it's, it's not can we afford to run a registry?
00:06:16.576 --> 00:06:24.185
But if you look at our national joint replacement registry and the significant savings over 20 years, the question is, can you afford not to?
00:06:24.995 --> 00:06:35.586
cause it's in the order of about$1.2 billion that have been saved from the Australian health budget by reducing outlier surgery or reducing revision surgery.
00:06:35.985 --> 00:06:41.805
So it's got benefits for both the surgeon, the patient, and the government who are funding the implants.
00:06:42.386 --> 00:06:47.021
Are they the main benefits at all?
00:06:43.875 --> 00:06:48.630
Prof Richard Page: Obviously there, The patient benefit's huge.
00:06:48.730 --> 00:06:50.576
And then there's, the social benefit.
00:06:51.266 --> 00:06:52.466
But there are.
00:06:52.901 --> 00:06:55.271
Shall we say academic and collaboration benefits?
00:06:55.271 --> 00:07:05.971
And, this is good for growing both expertise also, but for building, relationships, sharing information across different domains.
00:07:06.091 --> 00:07:27.423
If you look at our national registry, that's led to a range of collaborations with the Nordic countries, which are, Sweden for example, had some of the earliest registries and they've got a very well structured registry ethos America, other European countries, great Britain the National Registry in New Zealand, New Zealand , we're early adopters of a national joint registry.
00:07:27.783 --> 00:07:32.704
So there's interpersonal collaboration, there's academic collaboration.
00:07:33.004 --> 00:07:36.634
And what that does is, and you've gotta remember that registries are not steady.
00:07:36.694 --> 00:07:38.613
They evolve and change over time.
00:07:39.004 --> 00:07:49.084
That sharing of information refines the processes, improves the analysis, gives us better understanding of both the strengths but also the weaknesses of registries, where the gaps might be.
00:07:49.603 --> 00:07:53.684
So has improved how registries operate and also made them more efficient?
00:07:54.458 --> 00:07:58.447
And so they actually help contribute to improving patient outcome overall as well.
00:07:59.242 --> 00:07:59.663
Yeah, they do.
00:08:00.117 --> 00:08:25.843
And again, if you stick to the joint replacement registries then, and particularly our national registry, both through the action of collecting data, it's, a well known phenomena that once you start measuring something, particularly in medicine, you automatically start improving its outcomes 'cause people become more aware of what they're doing and they start using that information.
00:08:26.278 --> 00:08:29.608
To measure and test and refine their practice.
00:08:30.327 --> 00:08:37.018
So that's the part of the process of how it happens by the promoting the findings.
00:08:37.018 --> 00:08:40.947
And it, so that's, it's not just clearly, it's not just a collective data, that's not the end point.
00:08:41.307 --> 00:08:42.357
It's what you do with it.
00:08:42.357 --> 00:08:44.518
This what we think of as this audit cycle.
00:08:44.518 --> 00:08:51.508
You collect data, you measure, you then have to report and feedback, fi findings or changes and then try and improve.
00:08:52.197 --> 00:09:03.687
And it by that circle of providing information, firstly to surgeons where, we have a better understanding of what's going well and perhaps what's not going well or having such a good outcome.
00:09:03.687 --> 00:09:13.707
And at the end of the day, it's about reducing either unnecessary or revision surgery for patients and re reducing patient morbidity, improving the quality of care.
00:09:13.727 --> 00:09:15.557
How do you think they influence the practice?
00:09:15.557 --> 00:09:21.957
Apart from the the surgeons being aware of their actual outcomes what other ways can help influence practice?
00:09:21.962 --> 00:09:22.413
Yeah.
00:09:22.413 --> 00:09:39.212
First of all, as we get information or huge amounts of information, in fact about both types of surgeries that, that and how they're performing for different diagnoses around, arthritic conditions and in our domain around shoulder conditions.
00:09:39.602 --> 00:09:44.913
So what's working well, what the risks are, who the at risk patients might be.
00:09:45.572 --> 00:09:51.332
Obviously of great interest is whether we can modify any of those factors.
00:09:52.038 --> 00:10:01.077
Whether it's either the technical side of surgery or more particularly in patient selection, whether certain things do better in certain patient cohorts than others.
00:10:01.077 --> 00:10:05.518
And really importantly is what we call early signal detection.
00:10:05.518 --> 00:10:12.837
So early detection of when there might be a problem with a particular operation or a particular implant.
00:10:13.227 --> 00:10:29.855
So without this early monitoring and this early me measurement and then early assessment of the data, it could take five or 10 years , before you realize that a particular component or a particular type of operation is not doing so well.
00:10:30.754 --> 00:10:38.195
So this is a way of having some early feedback about and signals about something that, that might require close monitoring
00:10:38.195 --> 00:10:41.511
And I presume it's also helped by the fact that your pooling all the numbers together
00:10:41.701 --> 00:10:43.292
absolutely it's a sheer weight of numbers.
00:10:43.331 --> 00:10:59.022
You or I can only do so much in a, a week, a month and a year, and we may not be doing enough to actually uncover an area of our own practice or an area of a particular prosthesis, a particular implant that's actually not going so well.
00:10:59.022 --> 00:11:01.991
It's got complications, particularly for newer implants.
00:11:02.621 --> 00:11:19.652
And just by measuring that, we are also able to determine which implants, and grade them according to how well they've performed and what their risk of revision is over time, whether that be one to two years, five to 10 years.
00:11:20.042 --> 00:11:28.412
Now we're getting into 10, 15, and 15 and 20 year data sets for the, shall we say, the more classic style implants that have been around that long.
00:11:28.412 --> 00:11:31.081
Clearly not all implants that we're using have been around that long.
00:11:31.081 --> 00:11:45.871
And that's one of the, shall we say weaknesses, that there is things that come and go, but that early detection of or early information about how they're going, gives us either the confidence to keep going or makes us have a closer look.
00:11:46.351 --> 00:11:51.812
And sometimes we just have to earmark and say, we need to have a close look at this next year when we've got more numbers.
00:11:51.942 --> 00:11:53.172
As you said, as the numbers game,
00:11:53.846 --> 00:11:57.486
So obviously you've mentioned the importance of having numbers.
00:11:57.486 --> 00:12:01.207
For what challenges are there in maintaining a registry and actually setting up a registry?
00:12:01.600 --> 00:12:04.284
I mean, it's not for faint hearted to start up.
00:12:04.745 --> 00:12:05.825
You have to have funding.
00:12:06.095 --> 00:12:08.315
You have to be able to pay for the staff.
00:12:08.345 --> 00:12:21.495
'cause it is even with current digital data collection, there's still staff members, statisticians, data managers who need to make sure the data's accurate we still input some of our data, in fact, a lot of our data manually.
00:12:22.105 --> 00:12:23.125
Because it works.
00:12:23.754 --> 00:12:31.455
'cause one of the challenges is particularly in a country like Australia, we're like six different countries and two different territories.
00:12:32.085 --> 00:12:36.445
Each jurisdiction has its own IT infrastructure uses different software.
00:12:36.445 --> 00:12:39.445
So getting those to talk to each other is very difficult.
00:12:39.456 --> 00:12:51.005
Having said that, in Australia,'cause we're an island essentially particularly in orthopedics, it's very, difficult for a patient to have their first operation here and to have a subsequent operation elsewhere.
00:12:51.546 --> 00:12:54.245
Now, I wouldn't say it never happens, but it rarely happens.
00:12:54.546 --> 00:13:04.806
So if people are having knee follow up surgery, they generally have it at home or in Australia and because of the way the funding system works, it makes it much easier and more attractive for them.
00:13:05.495 --> 00:13:08.166
Therefore, we know what the denominator is.
00:13:08.796 --> 00:13:11.885
So if somebody has a revision operation, we are able to detect that.
00:13:12.306 --> 00:13:18.905
But going to the challenges, that requires a mechanism to tap in and detect that's happened.
00:13:18.936 --> 00:13:25.591
'cause , that clearly could happen across states and that's a bit like sometimes happening in a different neighboring country.
00:13:25.591 --> 00:13:37.530
But you have to have mechanisms therefore to data check and to do data linkage to check if, this patient that we've identified has had this operation and hello, they've.
00:13:37.530 --> 00:13:41.730
Gone to another state, two or three years later, they've had it operated on again.
00:13:42.061 --> 00:13:47.421
So you've gotta have a mechanism to be able to link the data sets and check that , on a regular basis.
00:13:47.421 --> 00:13:55.191
The other strengths we have are that you can do data linkages with different data sets like the pharmaceutical prescribing.
00:13:55.191 --> 00:13:57.801
So you can look at what their disease patterns are.
00:13:57.980 --> 00:14:05.331
I wouldn't say these things are straightforward, they're quite complicated, but they can be done about what other operations they've had or what other medical treatment they have.
00:14:05.331 --> 00:14:14.600
Through the MBS schedule, it's done in a way, in the background de-identified, so the privacy is preserved, but you're able to link certain patient identifiers.
00:14:15.291 --> 00:14:17.181
So you know a bit more about those patients.
00:14:17.681 --> 00:14:31.860
The weakness or the limitation is that you can't say things about outcomes or patient profiles or treatments that you're not measuring, so there what we call the confounders and you have confounders, which are known otherwise.
00:14:32.416 --> 00:14:41.385
Things we know about patients, like we collect data about their age, their BMI, for example, their general health status, which is their ASA.
00:14:41.596 --> 00:14:56.682
So that gives us some indication of how well or not they're, but we can't, for example necessarily know if they've had certain, surgery or other treatment on that joint or that particular body part before the registry started.
00:14:57.263 --> 00:15:01.133
So there's stuff that's happened in the background the unknown confounders that we can't adjust for.
00:15:01.629 --> 00:15:11.769
But on the whole, what we know in Australia with the Australian industry, we know with a high level of accuracy'cause our data the integrity is high.
00:15:11.769 --> 00:15:17.740
In other words, their data accuracy is high and the pickup rate is, essentially 99 plus percent.
00:15:18.190 --> 00:15:19.929
There's very little data we miss out.
00:15:20.080 --> 00:15:22.629
So we've got great confidence in the things that we can see.
00:15:23.274 --> 00:15:24.865
Interpret from our data set.
00:15:25.195 --> 00:15:27.205
And that gives us a huge strength.
00:15:27.205 --> 00:15:31.345
There's only a few other countries in the world that are able to do that with a high level of accuracy
00:15:31.916 --> 00:15:34.765
and this is all done on the background of de-identified data.
00:15:34.765 --> 00:15:36.145
So for the person listening.
00:15:36.490 --> 00:15:41.711
As a lay person, there's no way that we know who that person is or where they live or anything.
00:15:41.740 --> 00:15:44.350
We just know the sort of scores they've been given.
00:15:44.530 --> 00:15:49.451
We can make some assumptions about their health and their , body mass index and things like that.
00:15:49.764 --> 00:15:52.044
And privacy protection, paramount importance.
00:15:52.044 --> 00:16:01.205
And it's to have the, so shall we say, the confidence in that data being accurate, but at the same time, no one individual can be identified.
00:16:01.389 --> 00:16:03.519
, no one surgeon could be identified.
00:16:04.090 --> 00:16:09.610
And this is got an overarching protection as a quality and national quality.
00:16:10.149 --> 00:16:15.320
Assurance activity, which has got approval under the federal or parliament.
00:16:15.440 --> 00:16:19.279
In fact, it's enacted by Parliament and under the jurisdiction of the Federal Minister for Health.
00:16:19.279 --> 00:16:20.840
Those features are protected.
00:16:20.840 --> 00:16:25.129
And so, somebody could come in and say, I want that data, but they can't have it.
00:16:25.129 --> 00:16:29.956
Perhaps you can go through the history of the Australian Orthopedic National Joint Replacement Registry and the people that are involved in
00:16:30.105 --> 00:16:30.465
yeah.
00:16:30.465 --> 00:16:47.649
Look, it's, it the great thing about the registry, the great strength, it was set up by surgeons, by the Australian Orthopedic Association and some very, shall I say the forefathers, but they're mostly still around, but with who had great insight and a great vision to what could happen.
00:16:47.649 --> 00:16:58.019
And this was whilst observing what had already been started in other countries, as I said, particularly Sweden, was that really the first one, the first registry really got known, the Swedish Hip Registry got known in this space.
00:16:58.679 --> 00:17:04.589
So obviously there was a period of looking at how they did it and then trying to work out how that would work in our system.
00:17:04.859 --> 00:17:11.349
Clearly no two cultures and health systems are quite the same, so you have to be able to adapt it for that.
00:17:12.039 --> 00:17:19.744
But there was a group of people who got together and, started setting this up and one of the early people involved with David Davidson.
00:17:20.174 --> 00:17:23.674
And then it was led for a long time by Stephen Graves.
00:17:24.075 --> 00:17:28.410
And there were, other well-known surgeons, highly respected surgeon involved in it.
00:17:29.069 --> 00:17:33.359
Richard De Steiger was the next person in, and he'd been involved for a very long time from Melbourne.
00:17:33.414 --> 00:17:38.691
Won't list everybody, but there, there's an range of people and there's been a both a maturity in the registry.
00:17:38.730 --> 00:17:39.730
It's certainly bigger now.
00:17:39.730 --> 00:17:47.201
We've got about something in the order of 2.2 or it'll be soon getting up to 2.5 million joints, , in the registry.
00:17:47.250 --> 00:17:50.810
So it's a huge data set and there's a lot of data management involved.
00:17:51.500 --> 00:17:53.421
I clearly, the management of that has got more complex.
00:17:54.171 --> 00:18:01.131
So the, that's the sort of history of how it's started and it, when it started, it was very basic.
00:18:01.631 --> 00:18:10.510
It really was just measuring what was done, what was used, what the diagnosis was, and then almost as if figuring out the outcome later.
00:18:10.661 --> 00:18:16.090
But they were able to do that by matching surgical activity across each of the individual states.
00:18:16.810 --> 00:18:24.476
If you go to our area of practice, Gavin, there were a couple of us, a few of us, I was one of the pesky young surgeons who knew Steven.
00:18:24.536 --> 00:18:29.395
And at two or three meetings I kept on saying to him, we've gotta add, because it was, first of all, it was hip and knee.
00:18:29.395 --> 00:18:33.516
Gotta add shoulders to this, shoulders are a big joint, there's gonna be important, we should be.
00:18:33.756 --> 00:18:35.526
It's yeah, yeah, it's not very common.
00:18:35.526 --> 00:18:37.685
I dunno, there would be enough data, et cetera, et cetera.
00:18:37.715 --> 00:18:38.645
So it was a bit of resistance.
00:18:38.645 --> 00:18:42.125
And also there we required some additional funding.
00:18:42.455 --> 00:18:47.195
So what some of us were doing was taking the data collection sheets for knee replacements.
00:18:47.195 --> 00:18:52.355
And I was just crossing that out and writing shoulder and putting all the shoulder data on it, which they didn't know what to do.
00:18:52.415 --> 00:18:54.316
'cause the database wasn't set up for that.
00:18:54.316 --> 00:18:56.566
But to the team's credit, they didn't throw them out.
00:18:56.685 --> 00:19:01.036
They just kept them all in a pile and there was a few of your colleagues in South Australia were doing the same.
00:19:01.036 --> 00:19:03.855
And we'd talk at meetings and sort the word spread.
00:19:03.855 --> 00:19:04.276
It was just like.
00:19:04.786 --> 00:19:06.175
Look just keep doing it.
00:19:06.536 --> 00:19:08.066
They'll have to, they'll get it, they'll get that.
00:19:08.425 --> 00:19:10.375
We're interested in this as shoulder surgeons.
00:19:10.375 --> 00:19:11.516
And anyway, it grew.
00:19:11.576 --> 00:19:15.161
Long story short, that was, I started doing that in about 2004.
00:19:15.266 --> 00:19:19.675
In fact, the first joint entry was 14th of April, 2004.
00:19:19.726 --> 00:19:22.635
But that grew and eventually it was like, you know what?
00:19:22.726 --> 00:19:23.776
There's something in this.
00:19:23.786 --> 00:19:27.089
'cause there wasn't really much idea of how much shoulder replacements were done.
00:19:27.089 --> 00:19:31.883
But in that first year that there was approval that we included it, it wasn't all the states either.
00:19:31.883 --> 00:19:41.833
We couldn't include all states at the same time, because you have to get, approval from both the hospitals, the government and ethics committees to do it in every individual hospital.
00:19:41.833 --> 00:19:43.873
So you can imagine that's very time consuming.
00:19:44.373 --> 00:19:52.782
So very quickly it became apparent that we were doing, a measurable amount of shoulder replacement surgery, nowhere near as much as hip and knee, but that grew.
00:19:52.843 --> 00:19:56.903
And in the first incomplete year was about a thousand.
00:19:56.962 --> 00:20:00.083
And then soon it was, clearly close to 2000.
00:20:00.682 --> 00:20:04.792
Last year we did nearly 12,000 shoulder replacements nationally.
00:20:05.363 --> 00:20:24.143
So, it has been the fastest growing joint replacement, not just in Australia but globally, which probably says two things, that it was under serviced and this happened to knee replacements if you go back a couple of decades, there was a large unmet need, and also I think in the general practice setting.
00:20:24.143 --> 00:20:27.532
So going to, GP colleagues who tune into this Gavin.
00:20:28.173 --> 00:20:31.093
There was this kind of perception that, shoulders, they're no good.
00:20:31.593 --> 00:20:32.313
They don't work.
00:20:32.813 --> 00:20:37.343
If you go back 20 years before that was the same ethos around knee replacements.
00:20:37.343 --> 00:20:48.353
Now, yes, there are some that are not brilliant, but it certainly with shoulders perform in terms of revision rates and improvement in patient function and pain relief.
00:20:48.833 --> 00:20:49.792
Very close to hips.
00:20:49.792 --> 00:20:56.573
The satisfaction level for patients, if you look at the shoulder registry data, is not, is very close to hips.
00:20:56.573 --> 00:21:07.012
So I think from an efficacy point of view and a patient satisfaction point of view, it rates very highly and our GP colleagues are really starting to see that now.
00:21:07.042 --> 00:21:09.448
'cause I see patients there's a lot more shoulders being done.
00:21:09.647 --> 00:21:12.137
So anyway, that's a bit of the history and a bit of the, now we're up to.
00:21:12.468 --> 00:21:14.752
And how has the data evolved over those years too?
00:21:14.758 --> 00:21:14.913
You
00:21:14.913 --> 00:21:26.218
It is an interesting question when I first started as a young surgeon, I, had this idea that you have this, like for most research or studies you do, you have this really well defined set of data that you're gonna collect.
00:21:26.367 --> 00:21:29.968
And it's quite rigid and you can't change it because you don't want to muck it up.
00:21:29.968 --> 00:21:32.718
And you, needs to be able to compare what you're doing to later.
00:21:32.867 --> 00:21:33.827
So it's gotta be the same.
00:21:34.367 --> 00:21:36.317
Certainly when we started, that's what it was like.
00:21:36.347 --> 00:21:41.597
But registries are like a slowly evolving organism in that it has changed a lot over time.
00:21:41.897 --> 00:21:51.018
'cause you realize like some of the implants, for example, that we were using are no longer available, have been shown not to do so well or have been improved on.
00:21:51.018 --> 00:21:51.798
So they're different.
00:21:51.798 --> 00:21:52.278
They changed.
00:21:52.637 --> 00:21:55.698
So clearly that's data that you're not gonna collect anymore.
00:21:55.698 --> 00:22:08.290
'cause it's not happening, it's not being done Similarly you realize that there are additional data points, additional features around the, either the operation or the patient that have changed.
00:22:08.621 --> 00:22:12.671
And a good example is the advent or the introduction of some new technology.
00:22:13.330 --> 00:22:15.240
And, you don't want to miss that.
00:00:00.349 --> 00:00:08.220
00:00:08.710 --> 00:00:23.420
00:00:23.969 --> 00:00:25.940
00:00:26.370 --> 00:00:30.460
00:00:31.068 --> 00:00:36.069
00:00:36.899 --> 00:00:42.469
00:00:42.984 --> 00:00:50.734
00:00:50.784 --> 00:00:52.314
00:00:52.435 --> 00:01:02.904
00:01:03.875 --> 00:01:12.043
00:01:12.635 --> 00:01:18.194
00:01:18.564 --> 00:01:24.763
00:01:24.763 --> 00:01:28.543
00:01:28.864 --> 00:01:40.834
00:01:41.453 --> 00:01:51.243
00:01:51.243 --> 00:02:06.808
00:02:06.998 --> 00:02:09.717
00:02:10.048 --> 00:02:12.237
00:02:12.247 --> 00:02:15.548
00:02:15.848 --> 00:02:19.448
00:02:20.258 --> 00:02:24.609
00:02:24.614 --> 00:02:25.304
00:02:25.304 --> 00:02:27.924
00:02:28.373 --> 00:02:28.913
00:02:29.063 --> 00:02:29.813
00:02:29.813 --> 00:02:44.253
00:02:44.554 --> 00:02:47.943
00:02:48.424 --> 00:02:51.663
00:02:51.663 --> 00:02:52.114
00:02:52.213 --> 00:02:53.294
00:02:53.294 --> 00:02:56.493
00:02:56.824 --> 00:03:00.993
00:03:01.653 --> 00:03:09.633
00:03:10.324 --> 00:03:19.473
00:03:19.963 --> 00:03:26.998
00:03:27.329 --> 00:03:29.674
00:03:29.883 --> 00:03:42.834
00:03:43.334 --> 00:03:46.443
00:03:46.264 --> 00:03:46.443
00:03:46.443 --> 00:03:46.774
00:03:46.774 --> 00:03:55.979
00:03:55.979 --> 00:04:04.618
00:04:04.618 --> 00:04:15.283
00:04:15.283 --> 00:04:16.394
00:04:16.814 --> 00:04:24.454
00:04:25.074 --> 00:04:27.574
00:04:27.634 --> 00:04:33.423
00:04:34.098 --> 00:04:37.079
00:04:37.288 --> 00:04:38.728
00:04:38.968 --> 00:04:40.019
00:04:40.019 --> 00:04:46.315
00:04:46.716 --> 00:04:55.526
00:04:55.625 --> 00:05:03.696
00:05:03.696 --> 00:05:05.555
00:05:05.586 --> 00:05:07.776
00:05:07.776 --> 00:05:11.625
00:05:11.625 --> 00:05:13.425
00:05:13.966 --> 00:05:21.605
00:05:22.086 --> 00:05:37.386
00:05:37.865 --> 00:05:39.471
00:05:39.636 --> 00:05:45.815
00:05:45.935 --> 00:05:47.555
00:05:47.975 --> 00:05:53.656
00:05:53.656 --> 00:05:54.706
00:05:55.206 --> 00:05:56.375
00:05:56.375 --> 00:06:00.675
00:06:00.675 --> 00:06:09.526
00:06:10.076 --> 00:06:16.516
00:06:16.576 --> 00:06:24.185
00:06:24.995 --> 00:06:35.586
00:06:35.985 --> 00:06:41.805
00:06:42.386 --> 00:06:47.021
00:06:43.875 --> 00:06:48.630
00:06:48.730 --> 00:06:50.576
00:06:51.266 --> 00:06:52.466
00:06:52.901 --> 00:06:55.271
00:06:55.271 --> 00:07:05.971
00:07:06.091 --> 00:07:27.423
00:07:27.783 --> 00:07:32.704
00:07:33.004 --> 00:07:36.634
00:07:36.694 --> 00:07:38.613
00:07:39.004 --> 00:07:49.084
00:07:49.603 --> 00:07:53.684
00:07:54.458 --> 00:07:58.447
00:07:59.242 --> 00:07:59.663
00:08:00.117 --> 00:08:25.843
00:08:26.278 --> 00:08:29.608
00:08:30.327 --> 00:08:37.018
00:08:37.018 --> 00:08:40.947
00:08:41.307 --> 00:08:42.357
00:08:42.357 --> 00:08:44.518
00:08:44.518 --> 00:08:51.508
00:08:52.197 --> 00:09:03.687
00:09:03.687 --> 00:09:13.707
00:09:13.727 --> 00:09:15.557
00:09:15.557 --> 00:09:21.957
00:09:21.962 --> 00:09:22.413
00:09:22.413 --> 00:09:39.212
00:09:39.602 --> 00:09:44.913
00:09:45.572 --> 00:09:51.332
00:09:52.038 --> 00:10:01.077
00:10:01.077 --> 00:10:05.518
00:10:05.518 --> 00:10:12.837
00:10:13.227 --> 00:10:29.855
00:10:30.754 --> 00:10:38.195
00:10:38.195 --> 00:10:41.511
00:10:41.701 --> 00:10:43.292
00:10:43.331 --> 00:10:59.022
00:10:59.022 --> 00:11:01.991
00:11:02.621 --> 00:11:19.652
00:11:20.042 --> 00:11:28.412
00:11:28.412 --> 00:11:31.081
00:11:31.081 --> 00:11:45.871
00:11:46.351 --> 00:11:51.812
00:11:51.942 --> 00:11:53.172
00:11:53.846 --> 00:11:57.486
00:11:57.486 --> 00:12:01.207
00:12:01.600 --> 00:12:04.284
00:12:04.745 --> 00:12:05.825
00:12:06.095 --> 00:12:08.315
00:12:08.345 --> 00:12:21.495
00:12:22.105 --> 00:12:23.125
00:12:23.754 --> 00:12:31.455
00:12:32.085 --> 00:12:36.445
00:12:36.445 --> 00:12:39.445
00:12:39.456 --> 00:12:51.005
00:12:51.546 --> 00:12:54.245
00:12:54.546 --> 00:13:04.806
00:13:05.495 --> 00:13:08.166
00:13:08.796 --> 00:13:11.885
00:13:12.306 --> 00:13:18.905
00:13:18.936 --> 00:13:25.591
00:13:25.591 --> 00:13:37.530
00:13:37.530 --> 00:13:41.730
00:13:42.061 --> 00:13:47.421
00:13:47.421 --> 00:13:55.191
00:13:55.191 --> 00:13:57.801
00:13:57.980 --> 00:14:05.331
00:14:05.331 --> 00:14:14.600
00:14:15.291 --> 00:14:17.181
00:14:17.681 --> 00:14:31.860
00:14:32.416 --> 00:14:41.385
00:14:41.596 --> 00:14:56.682
00:14:57.263 --> 00:15:01.133
00:15:01.629 --> 00:15:11.769
00:15:11.769 --> 00:15:17.740
00:15:18.190 --> 00:15:19.929
00:15:20.080 --> 00:15:22.629
00:15:23.274 --> 00:15:24.865
00:15:25.195 --> 00:15:27.205
00:15:27.205 --> 00:15:31.345
00:15:31.916 --> 00:15:34.765
00:15:34.765 --> 00:15:36.145
00:15:36.490 --> 00:15:41.711
00:15:41.740 --> 00:15:44.350
00:15:44.530 --> 00:15:49.451
00:15:49.764 --> 00:15:52.044
00:15:52.044 --> 00:16:01.205
00:16:01.389 --> 00:16:03.519
00:16:04.090 --> 00:16:09.610
00:16:10.149 --> 00:16:15.320
00:16:15.440 --> 00:16:19.279
00:16:19.279 --> 00:16:20.840
00:16:20.840 --> 00:16:25.129
00:16:25.129 --> 00:16:29.956
00:16:30.105 --> 00:16:30.465
00:16:30.465 --> 00:16:47.649
00:16:47.649 --> 00:16:58.019
00:16:58.679 --> 00:17:04.589
00:17:04.859 --> 00:17:11.349
00:17:12.039 --> 00:17:19.744
00:17:20.174 --> 00:17:23.674
00:17:24.075 --> 00:17:28.410
00:17:29.069 --> 00:17:33.359
00:17:33.414 --> 00:17:38.691
00:17:38.730 --> 00:17:39.730
00:17:39.730 --> 00:17:47.201
00:17:47.250 --> 00:17:50.810
00:17:51.500 --> 00:17:53.421
00:17:54.171 --> 00:18:01.131
00:18:01.631 --> 00:18:10.510
00:18:10.661 --> 00:18:16.090
00:18:16.810 --> 00:18:24.476
00:18:24.536 --> 00:18:29.395
00:18:29.395 --> 00:18:33.516
00:18:33.756 --> 00:18:35.526
00:18:35.526 --> 00:18:37.685
00:18:37.715 --> 00:18:38.645
00:18:38.645 --> 00:18:42.125
00:18:42.455 --> 00:18:47.195
00:18:47.195 --> 00:18:52.355
00:18:52.415 --> 00:18:54.316
00:18:54.316 --> 00:18:56.566
00:18:56.685 --> 00:19:01.036
00:19:01.036 --> 00:19:03.855
00:19:03.855 --> 00:19:04.276
00:19:04.786 --> 00:19:06.175
00:19:06.536 --> 00:19:08.066
00:19:08.425 --> 00:19:10.375
00:19:10.375 --> 00:19:11.516
00:19:11.576 --> 00:19:15.161
00:19:15.266 --> 00:19:19.675
00:19:19.726 --> 00:19:22.635
00:19:22.726 --> 00:19:23.776
00:19:23.786 --> 00:19:27.089
00:19:27.089 --> 00:19:31.883
00:19:31.883 --> 00:19:41.833
00:19:41.833 --> 00:19:43.873
00:19:44.373 --> 00:19:52.782
00:19:52.843 --> 00:19:56.903
00:19:56.962 --> 00:20:00.083
00:20:00.682 --> 00:20:04.792
00:20:05.363 --> 00:20:24.143
00:20:24.143 --> 00:20:27.532
00:20:28.173 --> 00:20:31.093
00:20:31.593 --> 00:20:32.313
00:20:32.813 --> 00:20:37.343
00:20:37.343 --> 00:20:48.353
00:20:48.833 --> 00:20:49.792
00:20:49.792 --> 00:20:56.573
00:20:56.573 --> 00:21:07.012
00:21:07.042 --> 00:21:09.448
00:21:09.647 --> 00:21:12.137
00:21:12.468 --> 00:21:14.752
00:21:14.758 --> 00:21:14.913
00:21:14.913 --> 00:21:26.218
00:21:26.367 --> 00:21:29.968
00:21:29.968 --> 00:21:32.718
00:21:32.867 --> 00:21:33.827
00:21:34.367 --> 00:21:36.317
00:21:36.347 --> 00:21:41.597
00:21:41.897 --> 00:21:51.018
00:21:51.018 --> 00:21:51.798
00:21:51.798 --> 00:21:52.278
00:21:52.637 --> 00:21:55.698
00:21:55.698 --> 00:22:08.290
00:22:08.621 --> 00:22:12.671
00:22:13.330 --> 00:22:15.240