Oct. 6, 2023

Exploring Stroke Detection and Management with Interventional Neurologist Dr. Michael Waters

The player is loading ...

Send us a text

Have you ever wished to decode the mysteries of strokes and stroke management? Aussie Med Ed and Dr Gavin Nimon (Orthopaedic Surgeon) brings to you an enlightening conversation with Dr. Michael Waters, an eminent interventional neurologist at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Fasten your seatbelt and get ready for a journey into the realm of neurology, exploring strokes, transient ischemic attacks, and their impacts on different populations. Discover how advancements in technology are revolutionizing stroke detection and the pivotal role of timely detection in preventing larger stroke events.

In the second act, Dr. Waters shines light on the role of acute treatment in stroke management, especially thrombolysis and endovascular therapy. Listen to the intriguing insights about the emergency department's approach in swift detection and treatment, and the groundbreaking 2015 trials that demonstrated endovascular therapy's potency. Moreover, dive into the world of hemorrhagic strokes, their causes, and the potential of minimally invasive hematoma evacuation and neuroprotective agents in reducing neuronal damage.

The final leg of our podcast pivots on the advancements in neurology and the importance of team collaboration. Learn how a diverse team, from stroke nurses and neurologists to anesthetists and speech pathologists, combines their expertise to provide comprehensive care to stroke patients. Dr. Waters speaks about the promising use of technology in remote robotic procedures and the integral role of each team member. Lastly, we encourage you to connect with your general practitioner if you have any concerns or questions after listening to this episode. Don't miss out on this enlightening discussion on strokes and stroke management!

Aussie Med Ed is sponsored by -HealthShare is a digital health company, that provides solutions for patients, General Practitioners and Specialists across Australia.

Aussie Med Ed is sponsored by Avant Medical Indemnity: They state that they offer holistic support to help the doctor practice safely and believe they have extensive cover that's continually evolving to meet your needs in the ever changing regulatory environment.

00:00 - Understanding Stroke

15:06 - Acute Stroke Treatment and Clot Retrieval

28:54 - Advancements in Hemorrhagic Stroke Treatment

34:21 - Advancements in Neurology and Team Collaboration

40:31 - Expressing Gratitude and General Advice

WEBVTT

00:00:00.469 --> 00:00:05.820
G'Day did you realize that Hippocrates first described the sudden paralysis associated with stroke?

00:00:06.179 --> 00:00:12.000
And then in 2020, there was an estimated 39,000 stroke events in Australia, more than a hundred every day.

00:00:12.300 --> 00:00:18.269
With the incidence of stroke increasing from the age of 30 and their various causes of stroke varying, depending upon the age of the patient.

00:00:18.750 --> 00:00:20.399
Today, we're going to learn more about it.

00:00:20.689 --> 00:00:25.050
In the previous episode we spoke to Ewan(Puggy) and Liz about Puggy's stroke.

00:00:25.109 --> 00:00:28.559
And we heard about his intimate journey from their stroke to the a long road of recovery.

00:00:29.009 --> 00:00:37.732
Today we will dive into the diagnosis treatment and then the intricacies of cerebrovascular events to provide a comprehensive outline and treatment for these serious events.

00:00:37.732 --> 00:00:46.173
G'day and welcome to Aussie Med Ed, the Australian medical education podcast, designed with a pragmatic approach to medical conditions by interviewing specialists in the medical field.

00:00:46.463 --> 00:01:01.723
I'm Gavin Nimon an orthopaedic surgeon, and I'm based in Adelaide, and I'm broadcasting from Kaurna land I'd like to remind you that if you enjoy this podcast, please subscribe or leave a review or give us a thumbs up as I really appreciate the support and it helps the channel grow It's my pleasure now to introduce Dr.

00:01:01.723 --> 00:01:12.480
Michael Waters, an interventional neurologist who works at the Royal Adelaide Hospital following neurology training, he undertook a further three fellowship years, in interventional neuroradiology, both in Australia and in the United States.

00:01:12.989 --> 00:01:21.409
He works as a stroke neurologist and neurointerventionist, providing minimally invasive endovascular treatment for stroke, cerebral aneurysms and other neurovascular diseases.

00:01:22.129 --> 00:01:22.870
Welcome Michael!

00:01:23.920 --> 00:01:26.040
Michael, thank you very much for coming on Aussie Med Ed.

00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:27.969
No worries, good to be here.

00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:33.359
I'd like to, first of all, you've heard the story of Puggy, a friend of mine and his stroke.

00:01:33.989 --> 00:01:38.540
How would you actually define a stroke and how common are they that occur in Australia and around the world?

00:01:39.140 --> 00:01:44.560
Yeah, so I guess traditionally strokes were called cerebrovascular accidents or CVA's.

00:01:44.629 --> 00:01:50.390
And that naming changed in recent times because I guess we realized that they weren't really accidents anymore.

00:01:50.400 --> 00:01:52.370
We usually had a clear cause for them.

00:01:52.939 --> 00:01:57.480
And so now they're just termed generally a stroke and that covers both ischemic and hemorrhagic.

00:01:57.480 --> 00:02:03.685
So basically a stroke is damage to the brain due to a problem with the blood vessels.

00:02:03.724 --> 00:02:14.314
And the problem with the blood vessels can be a blocked blood vessel, which would be an ischemic stroke or a burst blood vessel, which is a hemorrhagic stroke, bleeding of the blood vessels.

00:02:14.314 --> 00:02:16.634
So that's the general classification.

00:02:17.145 --> 00:02:18.004
They're quite common.

00:02:18.995 --> 00:02:21.034
In Australia about 5%.

00:02:21.495 --> 00:02:25.375
The prevalence of stroke is about 5 percent in the over 65 age group.

00:02:25.974 --> 00:02:29.805
As you get to over 85, the prevalence is about 15%.

00:02:29.884 --> 00:02:30.995
So that's quite common.

00:02:31.504 --> 00:02:35.215
And in Australia, about 85 % of those strokes are ischaemic.

00:02:35.659 --> 00:02:42.199
And about 15% of hemorrhagic and that, changes as you go around the world and even within Australia.

00:02:42.199 --> 00:02:49.900
So Indigenous and First Nations people in Australia have a much higher incidence of stroke and prevalence of stroke, and especially hemorrhagic stroke.

00:02:49.900 --> 00:02:51.914
They're o overrepresented in that category.

00:02:52.504 --> 00:02:56.735
And then in certain parts around the world, the incidents and prevalence will be different as well.

00:02:57.025 --> 00:03:00.895
For example, subarachnoid hemorrhage, a type of hemorrhagic stroke.

00:03:01.664 --> 00:03:04.525
It's much more common in Japanese and Finnish people.

00:03:05.134 --> 00:03:09.064
Hemorrhagic stroke is more common in certain ethnic groups, including Chinese.

00:03:09.469 --> 00:03:14.539
And then also different types of ischemic strokes are more prevalent in different populations as well.

00:03:14.539 --> 00:03:22.469
For example, intracranial atherosclerosis as the cause of a stroke is quite common as a stroke subtype in the Chinese especially Han Chinese population.

00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:35.939
So it does vary as you go around the globe globally, about two thirds of stroke ischemic and about one-third is hemorrhagic which is slightly different from the numbers in Australia where the even higher proportion are ischemic.

00:03:37.514 --> 00:03:41.324
Okay, and where does transient ischemic attacks or TIAs fit into this picture?

00:03:41.715 --> 00:03:49.840
Are they mini strokes that just don't give a significant effect or are they just minor small blips in the actual function of the brain for short term function.

00:03:50.504 --> 00:03:57.185
Yeah, a mini stroke is a reasonable way to classify them, but they're really different by definition and by time course only.

00:03:57.215 --> 00:04:07.824
So a TIA by its definition is transient ischemia, which lasts less than 24 hours or without a signature of infarction on the MRI.

00:04:08.264 --> 00:04:12.115
So we're picking up a lot more strokes these days because MRI is so much more readily available.

00:04:12.354 --> 00:04:26.620
So symptoms that may have only lasted 15, 20 minutes and would previously be classified as a TIA is now leaving its stamp basically on an MRI so we can classify that as a stroke because it has been damaged to the brain tissue.

00:04:27.468 --> 00:04:33.826
But really, they can be as serious as each other, both deserve the workup to find the cause to prevent, further stroke or TIA.

00:04:34.456 --> 00:04:39.055
But yeah, really the same sort of pathological process, but different only by time course.

00:04:39.896 --> 00:04:51.466
So really in the past when I learned that TIA was a minor event that was actually a prelude to a stroke, really with better imaging and as the imaging improves with years to come, we actually realise that all of these are strokes and just as bad as each other.

00:04:52.440 --> 00:04:56.870
Yeah, certainly we need to take TIAs seriously because it can herald a larger stroke.

00:04:56.930 --> 00:05:04.911
People with firstly, new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atherosclerosis in the neck, which might present initially with just transient symptoms.

00:05:05.206 --> 00:05:07.726
they might be at very high risk of having a large stroke.

00:05:07.726 --> 00:05:09.656
So these are the patients that you definitely want to pick up.

00:05:10.637 --> 00:05:21.117
TIA can be tricky because, for example, most patients that come through a TIA clinic in the hospital pathway, the majority of those won't actually be a true TIA or ischemia.

00:05:21.987 --> 00:05:28.396
There's often stroke mimics such as migraine and Other causes of vertigo such as peripheral vertigo and these sort of stuff.

00:05:28.396 --> 00:05:37.706
So there's lots of stroke mimics but if it is a true TIA, then yeah, definitely deserves the respect that, true ischemia would deserve because it can be a herald to something more serious.

00:05:38.507 --> 00:05:39.026
Okay.

00:05:39.427 --> 00:05:43.887
You've mentioned the actual difference in the actual incidence depending on the population.

00:05:44.221 --> 00:05:46.101
What other risk factors are there as well?

00:05:46.221 --> 00:05:52.951
And, actually one thought when we are talking about the different incidences, does collagen deficiencies influence the risk of hemorrhagic type strokes as well.

00:05:52.961 --> 00:05:53.992
Is that a factor too?

00:05:55.817 --> 00:05:57.456
Yeah, so there's a lot of risk factors.

00:05:57.557 --> 00:06:04.737
In general terms, the risk factors for cardiovascular disease very similar to the risk factors for cerebrovascular disease.

00:06:04.817 --> 00:06:48.482
The major cerebrovascular risk factors are the classic ones such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes smoking, obesity, and then things like Alcoholism are also risk factors, renal failure, so they're the sort of, the classic ones that encompass the whole cardiovascular, cerebrovascular risk factors, and then there's more specific risk factors for certain types of strokes, so yes, collagen deficiency diseases can be risk factor for hemorrhagic stroke, for subarachnoid hemorrhage but also for vessel dissection, and vessel dissection can lead to to ischemic stroke, and then you've got your cardioembolic strokes as well and specifically looking at things like atrial fibrillation, which is the most the most common cause of a cardioembolic stroke.

00:06:49.851 --> 00:06:50.382
Okay.

00:06:50.922 --> 00:06:58.552
when you think of the actual risk factors, in the cardiac history, we use the Chadsvasc score to assess whether there's a risk of a cardiac event occurring.

00:06:58.562 --> 00:07:02.932
Is the CHADVAS score used in cerebral vascular accidents as well, or is it another type of score that's used?

00:07:04.377 --> 00:07:10.047
We, we don't specifically use Chadsvasc, although we use that for patients obviously with atrial fibrillation.

00:07:10.146 --> 00:07:18.456
We have other scores such as ABCD2 score, which looks at things like age, blood pressure and diabetes and previous stroke symptoms.

00:07:18.516 --> 00:07:22.656
There are scores that we use to classify an overall risk in someone with a TIA.

00:07:23.127 --> 00:07:28.096
And then a lot of the risk as well will depend on the imaging, which we do and the other tests that we do.

00:07:28.137 --> 00:07:41.286
For someone with a stroke, or stroke like symptoms, the key early investigations are a CT scan, and a CT angiogram, which gives us the parenchyma the tissue of the brain but also the vessels, the heart and the veins, the highways in and out.

00:07:41.857 --> 00:07:49.476
And that enables us to stratify risk quite early in an emergency setting by knowing what the vessels are looking like and knowing what the brain parenchyma looks like.

00:07:50.487 --> 00:07:53.086
So that's probably the most important early test to work out what's going on.

00:07:54.502 --> 00:07:57.732
So a CT angiogram as opposed to something like an MRI angiogram.

00:07:57.762 --> 00:08:02.492
Is that because a CT is a quicker investigation or is it just more easily available?

00:08:03.576 --> 00:08:07.086
Yeah, it's also a better investigation for blood vessels.

00:08:07.117 --> 00:08:08.487
It's much more readily available.

00:08:08.766 --> 00:08:15.177
In some countries such as France, then they often triage their stroke patients with MRI because it seems to be readily available in the big cities.

00:08:15.206 --> 00:08:21.596
But for us, yeah, the CT angiogram,, gives excellent vessels, luminal vessels, of what's going inside the blood vessel.

00:08:21.877 --> 00:08:25.026
If there's stenosis, if there's any thrombosis associated with that.

00:08:25.427 --> 00:08:26.637
And so that gives us everything we need.

00:08:27.262 --> 00:08:30.291
And then usually we'll do an mri, down the track to confirm.

00:08:30.291 --> 00:08:36.522
The MRI gives much better views of the actual parenchyma or the brain tissue whereas the blood vessels are well captured on a CT scan.

00:08:37.142 --> 00:08:40.147
In looking at a stroke, or someone who presents with acute stroke symptoms.

00:08:40.601 --> 00:08:48.772
To compare it to cardiac disease and our fields evolving in an interventional sense about 25 or 30 years interventional cardiologists.

00:08:48.802 --> 00:08:55.392
And so the direct comparison for a, for an ischemic stroke brain emergency is that heart emergency of the STEMI.

00:08:55.772 --> 00:09:01.782
So patient comes in with chest pain, and you want to see if the patient has a coronary vessel blockage or a STEMI.

00:09:02.152 --> 00:09:03.751
So similarly a patient comes in with.

00:09:04.461 --> 00:09:07.402
Neurological symptoms, so our chest pain is the neurological symptoms.

00:09:07.892 --> 00:09:12.971
Then the best first test, their best test would be the ECG to confirm the STEMI.

00:09:12.971 --> 00:09:18.802
Our best test to confirm the vessel occlusion for an ischemic stroke is is the CT angiogram.

00:09:19.351 --> 00:09:19.922
And then...

00:09:20.341 --> 00:09:24.942
Basically, then we can find the patients who are candidates for urgent reperfusion.

00:09:25.302 --> 00:09:31.812
Because we've also learned from our cardiology colleagues that, opening the blood vessel gives the patient the best outcome in the heart and in the brain.

00:09:32.131 --> 00:09:42.121
And so that sort of, urgent workup of the CT and the CT angiogram shows us which patients will benefit acutely from reperfusion and revascularization.

00:09:42.481 --> 00:09:44.552
Which gives them the best chance of a good outcome.

00:09:44.621 --> 00:09:47.072
And that's it for ischemic stroke specifically.

00:09:47.966 --> 00:09:48.317
yeah.

00:09:48.616 --> 00:09:55.657
So do you do a CT scan to assess whether there's a ischemic before or a hemorrhagic before you do the CT angiogram or do you just go straight to the CT angiogram

00:09:56.621 --> 00:09:56.981
We do.

00:09:57.001 --> 00:09:58.442
Yeah, you can, we go straight.

00:09:58.442 --> 00:10:00.542
So CT and CT angiogram.

00:10:00.542 --> 00:10:03.142
So CT gives us a lot of information.

00:10:03.142 --> 00:10:08.701
So CT, a plain CT scan will pick up hemorrhage and that'll be parenchymal hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage.

00:10:08.711 --> 00:10:11.532
So the different subtypes of hemorrhagic stroke.

00:10:11.981 --> 00:10:15.211
It'll show us in an ischemic stroke if the brain is already dead.

00:10:15.371 --> 00:10:19.761
If it's too far gone or if reperfusing the blocked blood vessel would be futile.

00:10:19.991 --> 00:10:21.231
So it shows us that as well.

00:10:21.581 --> 00:10:35.861
So the plain brain gives us a lot of information and then the CT angiogram shows us exactly what's going on with the vessels we're looking for an acute blockage which might be able to be reperfused, either through thrombectomy or through thrombolysis, we can.

00:10:36.206 --> 00:10:55.807
Probably talk about that in a bit, but also it's helpful for hemorrhagic stroke because hemorrhagic strokes can be due to aneurysm or subarachnoid hemorrhage, which can be due to obviously a cerebral aneurysm, which will be picked up usually on the CTA, arteriovenous malformations and other causes of intracranial hemorrhage will as well.

00:10:56.022 --> 00:10:57.861
We'll get a clue to those on the CTA.

00:10:58.322 --> 00:11:02.162
Some of those patients might require formal angiography, catheter angiography.

00:11:02.461 --> 00:11:06.572
But the CTA is a fantastic screening test for us to know what's going on with the vessels.

00:11:07.322 --> 00:11:17.792
And as well, more recently we're doing something called CT perfusion imaging, which basically shows us the area of thread and brain and shows us this key concept of what is the penumbra.

00:11:18.152 --> 00:11:25.777
So the penumbra is the salvageable tissue of the brain, which can be salvaged in an ischemic stroke if the blood vessels reopened.

00:11:26.706 --> 00:11:33.846
and so the CT perfusion imaging will show us that and show us which candidates will, which patients might benefit from acute reperfusion therapies.

00:11:36.326 --> 00:11:44.157
well take a step back, obviously a patient who we suspect is having a stroke, the most common symptoms you will see that they come in with, what would they be?

00:11:44.386 --> 00:11:48.106
And also how important is it to get to the hospital as quickly as possible?

00:11:50.366 --> 00:11:51.407
Yeah, it's very important.

00:11:51.427 --> 00:12:03.754
In a similar fashion, comparing to cardiology, we've learned a lot from our cardiology colleagues, not just in techniques and treatment and how to reperfuse, but also, educating the community about symptoms and how urgent symptoms are.

00:12:03.794 --> 00:12:06.514
So cardiology have done that very well with heart attacks and chest pain.

00:12:07.054 --> 00:12:14.794
And now there's, mnemonics and other catchy phrases to, try and identify or try and let the community know what the symptoms are of stroke.

00:12:15.304 --> 00:12:16.965
One is fast or be fast.

00:12:17.144 --> 00:12:19.774
So that'll cover a lot of the stroke symptoms.

00:12:19.784 --> 00:12:26.445
So B for balance, E for eyes or vision, F for facial droop, A for arm.

00:12:27.700 --> 00:12:30.330
S for Speech Disturbance, and T just for Time.

00:12:31.509 --> 00:12:38.389
BeFast, and the T showing the importance of time and getting to hospital urgently, so that you can be in a window for therapies.

00:12:38.870 --> 00:12:39.590
That covers most.

00:12:40.299 --> 00:12:48.019
Most of the big sort of symptoms of ischemic stroke of stroke, both hemorrhagic and ischemic, the problem is that brain is a very complex organ.

00:12:48.080 --> 00:12:50.940
And a stroke can affect any area of the brain.

00:12:51.039 --> 00:12:55.309
And so sometimes the signs or the symptoms of the stroke can be much more subtle.

00:12:55.830 --> 00:12:59.549
If you've got an isolated infarct in the hippocampus, you might just present with amnesia.

00:12:59.899 --> 00:13:22.500
If you've got a very small infarct around the thalamus or sensory cortex, it might just present with With some tingling or numbness on one side, so often the symptoms are more subtle, but the, a BeFAST type mnemonic covers, covers a lot of the symptoms that might indicate a larger stroke or one that would benefit from urgent reperfusion therapies.

00:13:24.154 --> 00:13:34.575
now obviously different areas will have different protocols, but in the Royal Adelaide Hospital, once a patient hits casualty and the A& E doctor appreciates that there could be a stroke occurring.

00:13:34.894 --> 00:13:36.745
What are the steps that they undertake?

00:13:36.745 --> 00:13:40.154
Do they undertake an ECG routinely to see for atrial fibrillation?

00:13:40.154 --> 00:13:44.105
Do we do bloods to look for coagulation profiles, etc.?

00:13:44.345 --> 00:13:46.414
What are the main investigations you'd want?

00:13:47.674 --> 00:13:51.634
Yeah, they do and it's a very coordinated effort when someone comes in as a stroke.

00:13:51.644 --> 00:14:02.304
So there's coordination between emergency and the EMS, the ambulance and the paramedics communicating with Ed initially and communicating with the code stroke team at the hospital.

00:14:02.634 --> 00:14:10.514
So there'll be some pre notification and so the team at the larger hospital can plan for them coming in and plan to get them straight through to the scan.

00:14:11.019 --> 00:14:17.009
So when they come in, yes, so they might already have a rhythm strip of the ECG from the ambulance.

00:14:17.289 --> 00:14:19.590
We will get a 12 lead ECG.

00:14:19.960 --> 00:14:21.200
in the emergency as well.

00:14:21.250 --> 00:14:25.000
But the most important thing is getting into the scanner to get the imaging.

00:14:25.409 --> 00:14:27.799
Because as you just mentioned before, time is very important.

00:14:28.629 --> 00:14:32.850
And time is brain is the, the phrase that's been used a lot in stroke.

00:14:32.919 --> 00:14:41.225
And that's because the acute therapies are time dependent, and the earlier you can deliver those acute therapies, then potentially the best outcome.

00:14:41.664 --> 00:14:44.125
So when they come into the ED there'll be a lot happening at once.

00:14:44.695 --> 00:14:48.024
There'll be brief history, there'll be IV access, there'll be an E C G.

00:14:48.029 --> 00:14:52.480
We'll make sure that there's a patent airway and that the patient's hemodynamically stable.

00:14:52.840 --> 00:14:58.700
And if that's the case, then they'll go straight on the ambulance stretcher into the CT scanner when they're in the CT scanner.

00:14:59.254 --> 00:15:07.715
Staff will be collecting some collateral information, time of onset, any anti coagulants and these sort of things that the patients might be on that might affect the treatment.

00:15:08.455 --> 00:15:12.544
and then as soon as we've got imaging, then we're making a decision about acute treatment.

00:15:12.595 --> 00:15:16.294
And that will depend on whether we're finding a ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke.

00:15:17.929 --> 00:15:18.409
right.

00:15:18.980 --> 00:15:21.080
So ischemic head strokes are the more common ones.

00:15:21.090 --> 00:15:24.090
It's not the puggy scenario, but we'll talk about ischemic first of all.

00:15:24.690 --> 00:15:28.809
We've already talked about the defining the actual cause atrial fibrillation or...

00:15:29.100 --> 00:15:32.659
The actual other events and knowing whether it's a vascular disease.

00:15:32.870 --> 00:15:40.840
Once you've defined that there is an ischemic stroke, and you've actually done your CT and CT angiogram, what are the most common types of techniques you would then perform in those scenarios?

00:15:40.840 --> 00:15:41.620
Where do you go from there?

00:15:41.679 --> 00:15:48.360
Yeah, I guess we're trying to identify early the patients who will benefit from acute reperfusion or reopening the blood vessel.

00:15:48.429 --> 00:15:50.370
And there's two main tools that we have for that.

00:15:50.850 --> 00:15:52.070
So the first is thrombolysis.

00:15:52.679 --> 00:15:55.820
We've been doing that for 20 plus years in stroke care.

00:15:56.200 --> 00:16:00.970
And so thrombolysis lacks specifically on the fibre and to break down a clot.

00:16:01.700 --> 00:16:06.210
And the time window for that was initially four and a half hours.

00:16:06.259 --> 00:16:11.860
That's been extended to nine hours or nine hours plus in certain circumstances of favorable imaging.

00:16:12.299 --> 00:16:14.110
But thrombolysis is only so effective.

00:16:14.470 --> 00:16:25.195
So depending on the location and of the clot and the length of the clot, Thrombolysis may only work for around somewhere between 30 and 40 percent of actual vessel blockages to reperfuse the vessel.

00:16:25.764 --> 00:16:32.875
So it was recognized reasonably early on in the 2000s that thrombolysis, although it was a good treatment, it wouldn't work for, for everyone.

00:16:32.975 --> 00:16:49.389
And so In 2015, there were a series of five landmark clinical trials, pivotal trials that showed the benefit of endovascular therapy or clot retrieval, retrieving the clot through an endovascular route from the brain and showed the benefit of that in reducing disability.

00:16:50.039 --> 00:16:54.549
And the Royal Adelaide was involved strongly with one of those trials, EXTEND IA.

00:16:54.909 --> 00:17:00.149
The stroke and the interventional teams there in recruiting patients for one of those trials that were published in 2015.

00:17:00.149 --> 00:17:08.210
And the five trials showed a remarkable benefit for patients with large vessel occlusion or the blockage of a large vessel.

00:17:08.470 --> 00:17:11.920
And the number needed to treat was about two and a half.

00:17:12.430 --> 00:17:23.099
Which , in medicine is a very impressive number needed to treat, especially when we look at the actual number needed to treat for some of our other interventions and, and therapies in cardiovascular medicine.

00:17:23.480 --> 00:17:28.660
So incredible benefit in restoring function and reversing the stroke syndrome.

00:17:29.069 --> 00:17:34.359
So that's what's happening these days is the patients are going for endovascular therapy for clot retrieval.

00:17:34.664 --> 00:17:40.315
If they've got a large vessel ischemic stroke and salvageable brain tissue basically.

00:17:40.654 --> 00:17:45.434
And initially the window was four and a half hours and up to six hours in the initial trials.

00:17:45.845 --> 00:17:55.265
We've since shown trials that show benefit of endovascular clot retrieval up to 24 hours in select patients who have favorable penumbral imaging on their CT scan.

00:17:56.960 --> 00:18:04.839
So , when you do a clot retrieval, which vessels can you actually retrieve the clot from, and what does it actually involve, and how big is the clot you bring out?

00:18:04.940 --> 00:18:10.319
There's three questions that come to mind straight off as you're talking, and I'm in awe of this such amazing treatment.

00:18:10.950 --> 00:18:12.640
Yeah, and it is a remarkable treatment.

00:18:12.690 --> 00:18:18.470
I guess when I first went into neurology training, this was available only in clinical trials.

00:18:18.529 --> 00:18:25.200
And then you see the results of these patients who without clot retrieval would be left with a severely disabling stroke or even life threatening stroke.

00:18:25.894 --> 00:18:28.464
And some of these patients were leaving hospital a couple of days later.

00:18:28.535 --> 00:18:34.984
So quite a remarkable and seductive treatment, which is part of the reason that I went down a neuro interventional pathway.

00:18:34.984 --> 00:18:39.325
I really wanted to do what was being done because it seemed such a powerful treatment.

00:18:39.634 --> 00:18:43.674
And I guess once we've identified the vessel occlusion, they come straight upstairs to an angio suite.

00:18:43.855 --> 00:18:48.555
And, to compare to cardiology again, because, people have a reasonable understanding of what happens in a cardiac lab.

00:18:48.964 --> 00:18:49.734
It's very similar.

00:18:49.734 --> 00:18:52.565
So they'll come onto the angio table, there'll be an x ray tube around them.

00:18:53.345 --> 00:19:00.595
We'll get access either through the wrist or the hip, usually done under local anaesthetic plus or minus a little bit of sedation, but sometimes they do need to go to sleep for it.

00:19:01.085 --> 00:19:09.085
and then we'll pass tubes and wires up to the vessels of the neck and the cardiologist would go down and we'll go up basically navigate to the vessels of the brain.

00:19:09.335 --> 00:19:11.005
In terms of size and what we can do.

00:19:11.005 --> 00:19:15.894
So initially it was just the proximal large vessels that were involved in these trials.

00:19:15.904 --> 00:19:18.345
So we're talking internal carotid artery.

00:19:18.704 --> 00:19:23.064
M1, MCA, M1 occlusions, proximal M1 basilar artery occlusions.

00:19:23.114 --> 00:19:33.124
But now we're finding that we can go more distal more safely and techniques and technologies advancing so that our catheters and wires can go further out safely in the brain.

00:19:33.124 --> 00:19:42.943
Nowadays we're often retrieving clots from the more distal segments, M3 MCA segments in the ACAs as well, using smaller devices.

00:19:43.354 --> 00:19:44.943
And the clot that comes out is usually.

00:19:45.614 --> 00:19:46.703
Pretty small, to be honest.

00:19:47.213 --> 00:19:52.564
People, med students and trainees who come into the lab and you'll pull the clot out and they'll look at it and go, is that it?

00:19:53.394 --> 00:20:05.513
But, these are small vessels, they're, the vessels we're pulling them out of are usually somewhere between three and one millimetre, and so it doesn't take a big clot to cause a significant amount of neurological disability.

00:20:07.413 --> 00:20:08.894
It's amazing, it's really amazing.

00:20:09.443 --> 00:20:14.683
With the actual prevention side of things, I'll just, I'll get onto this for a sec while we're on the actual process.

00:20:15.134 --> 00:20:16.034
Obviously...

00:20:16.344 --> 00:20:24.483
We've talked about atrial fibrillation being a risk factor, but if you've got atherosclerosis in the large vessels, in the past, the people used to talk about doing endarterectomies.

00:20:25.003 --> 00:20:26.983
I Presume you can do stents and things for this.

00:20:27.144 --> 00:20:33.453
Also would wonder, also what about the people with vertebrobasilar insufficiency, and you've actually got blockage of the basilar vessels too.

00:20:33.463 --> 00:20:34.503
Can that be treated as well?

00:20:34.503 --> 00:20:37.443
There's plenty of people I see, where they extend their neck and they feel a bit dizzy.

00:20:37.854 --> 00:20:39.384
Is that a risk factor for strokes?

00:20:39.443 --> 00:20:41.173
And can that be treated as well?

00:20:42.624 --> 00:20:46.618
Yeah in the, in an acute stroke setting then the answer is quite simple.

00:20:46.659 --> 00:20:52.068
If you've got the blocked vessel, then the evidence is that if you retrieve and open that blood vessel then patients will do better.

00:20:52.398 --> 00:20:57.608
And some of the occlusions that we see there's the majority of strokes we see are embolic strokes.

00:20:57.618 --> 00:21:00.919
So the large vessel occlusion strokes are embolic, meaning they've come from somewhere else.

00:21:00.919 --> 00:21:03.909
So cardioembolic, atheroembolic for the, from the neck.

00:21:04.459 --> 00:21:16.808
If they're atheroembolic from the neck, then yes, sometimes we, to actually get access up there, we need to stent and balloon blood vessels to get access and so we treat the cause as well as removing the clot at the same time.

00:21:17.878 --> 00:21:21.088
To treat other conditions before they've had stroke.

00:21:21.943 --> 00:21:37.314
We still don't have great evidence for, so carotid stenting is one area where, they're starting to become equipoised with carotid endarterectomy, but we're probably still not quite there, so strictly speaking, carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis, symptomatic carotid stenosis is still the gold standard.

00:21:37.743 --> 00:21:47.919
But as devices and technology improvements, stroke risk of the procedure decreases, then we may get to the point where there's, there's complete equipoise or stenting is superior.

00:21:48.239 --> 00:21:55.808
Vertebra basilar disease is a bit more complicated just because the vessels, the vertebral arteries are smaller and often more tortuous.

00:21:56.479 --> 00:22:16.979
There was a trial previously looking at vertebral stenosis to balloon angioplasty, vertebral stenosis for symptomatic posterior circulation disease or insufficiency, but it didn't really show a clear benefit, , and so we don't know exactly where the line is yet with treating before someone has a stroke for these conditions.

00:22:16.979 --> 00:22:41.003
We know that medical therapies are effective but we don't know if we should be Stenting every patient that we see with a stenosis, the answer to that is definitely no and we're still finding the right patients to select and treat on a secondary prevention point of view, rather than treating them with, medicines and and lifestyle measures some of those patients, may benefit from intervention, but we're still, we still haven't worked out exactly who they are.

00:22:42.243 --> 00:22:50.653
And as I understand it, so then the embolic events are the main causes, and that's for either from atrial fibrillation or atherosclerotic vessels.

00:22:51.054 --> 00:23:01.354
And that's why treatment of cholesterol or an anticoagulation to reduce the risk of embolic events from atrial fibrillation, are the most important preventative measures at this stage.

00:23:01.358 --> 00:23:01.929
Is that correct?

00:23:02.989 --> 00:23:03.538
Yeah.

00:23:03.588 --> 00:23:04.269
Yeah, absolutely.

00:23:04.269 --> 00:23:04.489
Yeah.

00:23:04.499 --> 00:23:09.659
Preventative measures in general, the things that help with cardiovascular health will help with cerebrovascular as well.

00:23:09.659 --> 00:23:18.368
So daily exercise, limiting salt intake, balanced diet, some evidence for, Mediterranean type diet with, fish, vegetables, legumes, that sort of stuff.

00:23:18.719 --> 00:23:20.949
That's general advice that we would give everyone.

00:23:21.778 --> 00:23:23.749
And then there's other things that we can modify.

00:23:23.949 --> 00:23:25.878
For stroke, blood pressure is probably the big one.

00:23:25.959 --> 00:23:30.909
So blood pressure is where you probably get the biggest bang for your buck in terms of prevention, both.

00:23:31.409 --> 00:23:37.808
Because it's associated so strongly in a linear relationship with both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.

00:23:38.118 --> 00:23:44.979
And so there's definite evidence that if we're, treating blood pressure, treating hypertension, then we're, going to be reducing the incidence of stroke.

00:23:44.979 --> 00:23:47.699
So that's where you get often your highest benefit.

00:23:48.078 --> 00:23:54.398
But as well, treating cholesterol to target with statins, with with other exercise and diet as well as important.

00:23:54.818 --> 00:24:02.469
And then, as you say, if we identify certain factors such as actual fibrillation then specific antithrombotic therapy for that.

00:24:02.798 --> 00:24:08.979
With antithrombotic, generally people with atherosclerosis will be on antiplatelets and statins and that sort of medication.

00:24:09.338 --> 00:24:12.009
People with atrial fibrillation will be on anticoagulation.

00:24:12.398 --> 00:24:20.648
And most patients now without atrial fibrillation will be on the NOACs or the DOACs the novel or the direct oral anticoagulants as opposed to warfarin.

00:24:21.489 --> 00:24:25.864
Unless there's coexisting valvular heart disease or mechanical valves in.

00:24:26.523 --> 00:24:31.423
And so treating those things, gives, large benefit in reducing the risk of stroke.

00:24:31.463 --> 00:24:43.703
For example, someone with atrial fibrillation with a moderate CHADS VASc score being on anticoagulation versus not, their stroke risk can go from somewhere like 12 percent a year down to about, three to 4 percent a year.

00:24:43.723 --> 00:24:50.844
So there's a significant benefit in identifying things like atrial fibrillation and treating it appropriately.

00:24:50.894 --> 00:24:59.433
And in those patients fibrillation on anticoagulation, what's the risk of stopping it for a few days for an operation, which obviously is important for myself.

00:24:59.443 --> 00:25:00.544
We stop them for five days.

00:25:00.544 --> 00:25:06.263
Does that increase the risk significantly by stopping and restarting it, or is that a minor risk for those few days?

00:25:06.739 --> 00:25:07.278
Yeah.

00:25:07.318 --> 00:25:09.838
In the majority of patients, the risk won't be huge.

00:25:09.878 --> 00:25:15.893
If you think about the stroke risk over the year of 5%, and then, a few days taken away at the anticoagulation.

00:25:15.893 --> 00:25:17.423
So the stroke risk shouldn't be huge.

00:25:17.982 --> 00:25:26.722
The problem is that we often do see patients who come in with anticoagulation held just for a week with, with a stroke and with a large vessel occlusion.

00:25:27.133 --> 00:25:28.788
And so maybe we're a bit.

00:25:29.097 --> 00:25:33.117
Swayed by that because we're actually seeing the ones that do fall through the cracks a little bit.

00:25:33.528 --> 00:25:39.827
I think that's just, there's hundreds and hundreds who go off their anticoagulation and don't have a stroke in the perioperative period.

00:25:40.097 --> 00:25:43.567
So I think we're just, we're just capturing the ones that, that unfortunately do.

00:25:44.073 --> 00:26:05.583
I think for anyone who's at a, on the higher CHA2DS2 VASc score then we might need to consider bridging perioperatively, but even that's a little bit controversial because there was a, a trial back a number of years ago that said probably the bridging benefit for most of these patients, if they don't have a mechanical valve if they don't have severe OB dysfunction, the risk of bridging probably outweighs the benefit in terms of bleeding.

00:26:05.583 --> 00:26:05.863
so.

00:26:06.688 --> 00:26:07.748
We don't have a great answer.

00:26:08.198 --> 00:26:11.377
I think potentially the higher risk patients we, we might still need to bridge.

00:26:11.708 --> 00:26:17.548
But generally speaking, yeah, a few days off the oral anticoagulant is not a huge problem for most patients.

00:26:17.807 --> 00:26:18.018
Yeah.

00:26:19.137 --> 00:26:31.258
And then the other, before we move on to the hemorrhagic strokes, one other question that comes to mind is, What about the person on anticoagulation who actually is quite active in sport and they might be at risk of having injuries or knocks to their head.

00:26:31.928 --> 00:26:35.867
Maybe not Aussie rules football but they might be doing some mountain bike riding for instance.

00:26:36.417 --> 00:26:38.488
And they're on a anticoagulation.

00:26:38.817 --> 00:26:45.057
We're worried about the risk of an embolic stroke from atrial fibrillation, but what about the risk of a major hemorrhagic stroke from a head injury?

00:26:45.678 --> 00:26:49.048
When does the risk anticoagulation?

00:26:50.343 --> 00:26:59.853
Yeah, I think for someone who's having repetitive head trauma or high risk of trauma to the head, then the risk of subdural hematoma is another intracranial hemorrhage probably is too high.

00:27:00.262 --> 00:27:01.682
There's a lot of patients who we have.

00:27:02.032 --> 00:27:22.482
Who are younger patients who the atrial fibrillation is picked up and, these patients still, they still ride bikes, they still play, non contact sports, I'd be reluctant to be, playing a high velocity sport with potential head impact on on any coagulation definitely, but I think generally speaking, most other sports and pursuits, are going to be okay.

00:27:22.482 --> 00:27:22.732
Yeah.

00:27:24.887 --> 00:27:26.698
Moving on to the hemorrhagic stroke now.

00:27:27.048 --> 00:27:30.827
So, you said that's about 15 percent in Australia , of a stroke being hemorrhagic.

00:27:30.827 --> 00:27:34.317
How does that intervention vary once you pick up a hemorrhagic stroke?

00:27:34.317 --> 00:27:45.337
And I understand we've seen the video of Puggy, and it'll be different in the UK, so we're not discussing his case in particular, I'm just talking about in general, at the Royal Adelaide Hospital at this stage.

00:27:45.738 --> 00:27:49.048
So how does it vary what happens compared to an ischemic stroke?

00:27:49.837 --> 00:27:50.268
Yeah.

00:27:50.847 --> 00:27:53.528
Yeah, so hemorrhagic stroke, I mean it is quite different.

00:27:53.627 --> 00:28:02.817
In some ways with all the advent of the new treatment for ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke has almost been the poor cousin and left behind a little bit.

00:28:03.048 --> 00:28:08.252
But there are some exciting changes to that which are happening at the moment, which we'll get to in a bit.

00:28:08.772 --> 00:28:10.603
Hemorrhagic stroke is quite diverse.

00:28:11.063 --> 00:28:16.843
Hemorrhagic stroke encompasses subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is often aneurysmal or from vascular malformations.

00:28:17.232 --> 00:28:23.192
It includes vascular malformations and other dural fistulas and things like that, which have bled into the brain.

00:28:23.663 --> 00:28:24.637
And then there's...

00:28:24.928 --> 00:28:32.498
The more common types of hemorrhagic stroke which are, um, parenchymal hemorrhagic strokes, and they can be either lobar.

00:28:33.307 --> 00:29:04.853
So in the peripheries of the brain, which is often associated with amyloid angiopathy, a condition that's more common over, over 65, or they can be In a traditional deeper location in the brain, which are traditionally your hypertensive hemorrhages, which we now rephrase as arteriolosclerotic hemorrhages, because they seem to have, they're not specifically due to hypertension, but they're due to a vast, a host of risk factors, which causes damage to the smaller blood vessels, which makes them more prone to bleeding.

00:29:05.262 --> 00:29:08.383
And so they're the general, that's the general classification for hemorrhagic stroke.

00:29:09.262 --> 00:29:20.643
Whereas ischemic stroke has the penumbra and that's a salvageable penumbra, the main issue for hemorrhagic stroke is that the blood itself is quite, or the blood breakdown products are quite toxic.

00:29:21.022 --> 00:29:23.623
And so the surrounding areas of the brain.

00:29:24.292 --> 00:29:29.982
have secondary damage because of this toxicity of the blood and the breakdown products of the blood.

00:29:30.452 --> 00:29:36.653
And so if you can prevent that, then you can potentially prevent further disability from stroke, from the hemorrhagic stroke.

00:29:37.222 --> 00:29:50.657
What we're looking at these days, the urgency for someone with a hemorrhagic stroke is just the same as someone with ischemic, with ischemia because Early things such as, tight blood pressure control can prevent hematoma expansion.

00:29:51.057 --> 00:29:55.627
As soon as you get hematoma expansion in a hemorrhagic stroke, then the outcomes worsen.

00:29:55.948 --> 00:29:57.778
So early blood pressure control.

00:29:58.528 --> 00:30:01.657
Whereas with an ischemic stroke, you actually want the blood pressure to be up a little bit.

00:30:02.057 --> 00:30:04.853
To feed to make that penumbra more salvageable.

00:30:05.272 --> 00:30:12.472
So tight blood pressure control reversal of any coagulopathy that might be present is really important as well early on for a hemorrhagic stroke.

00:30:13.423 --> 00:30:34.008
and a lot of these patients may need more intensive therapy or blood pressure therapy and infusions, such as in ICU So that's the acute medical management, which, is initiated straight away, an area where we're potentially going to see more treatment for hemorrhagic stroke is in early minimally invasive hematoma evacuation.

00:30:34.407 --> 00:30:40.512
So this is something that's under ongoing trials at the moment, and one of those is being run out of the Royal Adelaide, it's called Evacuate.

00:30:40.972 --> 00:30:55.702
and that sort of sums up the trial quite well, is that, the neurosurgeons will make a small craniectomy, and then with a surgery scope, which you can visualise the clot within the brain, then that will be Extracted under under direct visualization.

00:30:55.722 --> 00:31:03.673
So actually removing the clot so that there's less of that toxicity and secondary neuronal damage as a result of the blood sitting there.

00:31:04.563 --> 00:31:19.123
and it's shown some early promise in, potentially evacuating that clot early will limit the secondary deleterious effects of the blood and the blood breakdown products and prevent further, expansion of the neuronal damage.

00:31:19.423 --> 00:31:24.853
And so that, that's shown promise already in , one other randomized control trial looking at hematoma evacuation.

00:31:25.232 --> 00:31:33.792
And so it might be something that's done more routinely for hemorrhagic stroke to actually evacuate the clot and allow them to to start recovering earlier.

00:31:34.792 --> 00:31:50.123
If the breakdown products of the blood actually are toxic, is there any way of actually trying to minimise that breakdown products by giving, if it's acidic, can you put more alkali into the body to help cross the blood brain barrier and help reduce the acidic nature of that toxic component?

00:31:50.123 --> 00:31:52.982
Or is there any other ways you can neutralise those effects?

00:31:54.613 --> 00:31:55.173
Potentially.

00:31:55.173 --> 00:32:02.613
This is, this probably gets on to the, what I think is the next big step in, in stroke management in general.

00:32:02.762 --> 00:32:09.472
And that's, I think that the Holy Grail for stroke care, both ischemic and hemorrhagic is not going to be a new procedure that we do.

00:32:09.472 --> 00:32:10.823
I think it's going to be a medication.

00:32:10.932 --> 00:32:13.113
I think it's going to be some sort of neuroprotective agent.

00:32:13.423 --> 00:32:15.153
So something exactly like you mentioned.

00:32:15.202 --> 00:32:38.843
For ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke, it will be something that when there is potential damage to the neurons that we're administering an agent, which is basically putting the brain on ice, so to speak and allowing these therapies to happen, either the evacuation of the clot, or the evacuation of the and allowing the brain more time, basically, and more potential then to regenerate.

00:32:39.252 --> 00:32:47.633
And then another area as well, which You know, we're looking at which hopefully might aid in recovery is looking at agents that aid neuroplasticity.

00:32:48.133 --> 00:32:58.472
We've talked about the acute stage of a stroke, but long term and as Puggy talked about, it just keeps over time, there's continued improvement and that's because of neuroplasticity.

00:32:58.823 --> 00:33:01.722
And the brain, despite having pathways that are damaged.

00:33:02.127 --> 00:33:06.968
New pathways will form and the brain will find new ways to create neuronal circuitry.

00:33:06.968 --> 00:33:14.097
And so medication which looks at enhancing that sort of neuroplasticity as well might be another sort of area where.

00:33:14.627 --> 00:33:16.917
Big gains are made in patient outcomes.

00:33:18.053 --> 00:33:29.272
That neuroplasticity just rings home to one of my favourite operations in orthopaedics and upper limb is when we do a tendon transfer from the index finger to the thumb, the patient wakes up and straight away moves the thumb.

00:33:29.692 --> 00:33:33.853
They don't have to think, I'm going to move the finger and the thumb moves, it just works straight away.

00:33:33.873 --> 00:33:35.673
And it goes to show how amazing the brain is.

00:33:36.732 --> 00:33:45.053
The actual neurology side of things, you've got Stephen Bacchi who was on our podcast earlier, coming through the ranks with his involvement in artificial intelligence.

00:33:45.472 --> 00:33:55.012
And I've asked these questions to a lot of my podcasters since we've had Stephen on, the AI working out sort of programs or algorithms to work out which patients actually benefit from which procedures.

00:33:55.387 --> 00:33:58.327
Is that already being used at the moment in neurology

00:33:58.377 --> 00:34:05.557
it is a little yeah, we, when we're using our perfusion imaging, we're getting maps that are, it spits out a map for us.

00:34:05.557 --> 00:34:14.777
It brings in all the data and shows us a map and it gives a basically a red and a green sort of a stop go type picture and says, this is the area of the brain that's good.

00:34:14.777 --> 00:34:15.978
This is the area that's bad.

00:34:16.307 --> 00:34:19.307
And then for certain clinical trials as well, that will then.

00:34:20.322 --> 00:34:24.643
Tell you if they're a candidate for that trial, which is how to help with recruitment and stuff previously.

00:34:24.952 --> 00:34:30.373
But as well, it gives you a immediate sort of, idea of what's happening with the MAP and the blood flow.

00:34:30.702 --> 00:34:50.523
The tricky thing is with AI and the perfusion imaging and the CT imaging is that at the moment, it's probably not yet as good as the human eye because the plain CT brain is often the most important scan and if you're missing subtle things on the plain brain such as small bits of blood and then you're looking to thrombolyze someone, that can have quite significant outcomes.

00:34:50.583 --> 00:34:52.282
From what I've seen, it's not quite good enough.

00:34:52.282 --> 00:34:57.242
For Yet and human is still better that may change, pretty soon.

00:34:57.992 --> 00:35:05.393
There's other areas where technology is going to not replace us, but hopefully work hand in hand with us.

00:35:05.452 --> 00:35:08.413
One of them is in specifically for neurointervention.

00:35:08.452 --> 00:35:12.293
One thing that we might be doing in the future is robotic neurointervention.

00:35:12.652 --> 00:35:16.972
And it might be, it might enable us to do procedures remotely.

00:35:18.103 --> 00:35:25.572
This has particular relevance to South Australia because our stroke service covers all of rural South Australia and the Northern Territory.

00:35:25.913 --> 00:35:38.972
And so some patients who may have the stroke in Darwin or Alice Springs the time to get them here You know, in the to get them to the Royal Adelaide for a clot retrieval, it could be four, six, eight hours depending on transport.

00:35:38.992 --> 00:35:41.672
So by that time, their penumbra may have completely infarcted.

00:35:42.353 --> 00:35:47.552
So remote robotic procedures have already been done in certain settings.

00:35:47.552 --> 00:35:50.762
They've been done in cardiology, but they're starting to be done in near intervention.

00:35:51.193 --> 00:35:54.072
And all you would need is an angiolab in one centre.

00:35:54.072 --> 00:35:56.532
So Alice Springs and Darwin could be perfect for that.

00:35:56.952 --> 00:36:05.532
And if you've got an angiolab and you've trained some local staff, then we could be doing our procedures robotically, remotely to extract these clots.

00:36:06.202 --> 00:36:11.492
So yeah, that's I guess one example of where technology might be helping us and working hand in hand with us.

00:36:13.123 --> 00:36:13.532
Wow.

00:36:14.972 --> 00:36:17.902
Obviously, you've done a lot of training to be at this stage.

00:36:18.512 --> 00:36:21.393
Who makes up the team, the code stroke team?

00:36:21.432 --> 00:36:22.132
Is it yourself?

00:36:22.132 --> 00:36:26.972
I presume there's a few of you that, on call . What is the actual team that make up for a stroke unit?

00:36:27.813 --> 00:36:30.262
Yeah, it's a great multidisciplinary team.

00:36:30.702 --> 00:36:38.472
We have stroke nurses who are often the first on hand in emergency to code strokes and they come they're specifically trained and they're very good at what they do.

00:36:39.012 --> 00:36:46.523
And they follow the patient from their first port of call and emergency to the time they head off to rehabilitation and they're involved with their care on the ward.

00:36:46.902 --> 00:36:51.682
They're doing swallow screens, they're, looking at imaging with us, they're liaising with with other medical staff.

00:36:51.842 --> 00:36:52.753
They're really important.

00:36:53.623 --> 00:36:59.733
On the ground in the emergency department, we have residents and registrars who are on the code stroke service.

00:37:00.333 --> 00:37:07.043
And they will be the ones helping to get the patient into the scanner as quickly as possible, getting the histories, getting the collaterals and that sort of stuff.

00:37:07.543 --> 00:37:10.523
We have a stroke neurologist that's on call, 24 7.

00:37:10.983 --> 00:37:16.152
and there's about six or seven of us at the Royal Adelaide at the moment who rotate that call.

00:37:16.563 --> 00:37:22.123
And then we have, at the moment we have four new interventionalists, at the Royal Adelaide who are doing the procedures for stroke.

00:37:23.157 --> 00:37:26.088
There's myself and there's two radiologists and one neurosurgeon.

00:37:26.117 --> 00:37:32.297
So we have a really diverse group and that really helps to have those three backgrounds covered with the interventional procedures as well.

00:37:32.818 --> 00:37:35.588
And then, we're very reliant on anesthetic colleagues.

00:37:35.972 --> 00:37:40.902
To, provide services for these patients when they do any of their procedures and often with, little to no warning.

00:37:40.902 --> 00:37:43.353
So our anaesthetic colleagues help us a lot.

00:37:43.773 --> 00:37:50.402
Intensive care help us post procedure often, to manage blood pressure, manage oedema and these sort of things.

00:37:50.523 --> 00:37:58.632
Neurosurgery may be called on occasionally for hemicraniectomies and other interventions that might be required to, to relieve pressure on the brain.

00:37:59.452 --> 00:38:06.733
And then, once the acute treatment is done, the interventional treatment, we're so reliant on our allied health team.

00:38:06.833 --> 00:38:15.293
So speech pathologists, OTs, physiotherapists, who will then be, spending the days and weeks ahead with these patients and getting the best outcome for them.

00:38:16.293 --> 00:38:16.753
Wow.

00:38:17.443 --> 00:38:20.913
And then they've obviously progressed to a rehab facility as well.

00:38:20.913 --> 00:38:25.503
Something like, at the moment, it would be Hampstead or the Repatriation Hospital in South Australia.

00:38:25.972 --> 00:38:28.583
and where they'd probably stay like Puggy did for some months.

00:38:28.693 --> 00:38:30.032
Rehabilitating, I presume.

00:38:30.072 --> 00:38:32.802
Is that, and there'll be another team involved in that as well.

00:38:32.862 --> 00:38:33.262
Yeah.

00:38:33.422 --> 00:38:33.603
Yeah.

00:38:33.652 --> 00:38:36.643
Some patients now are lucky in that they might leave hospital.

00:38:37.302 --> 00:38:44.692
24, 48 hours after their procedure, they're the lucky ones who are, have been reperfused and and have, very minimal or no stroke.

00:38:45.322 --> 00:38:59.202
A lot of the patients, despite reperfusion or if they're presented later or with hemorrhagic stroke where the acute interventions aren't as progressed as what they are for ischemic, then yeah, some of these patients might need anywhere between days, weeks and months in rehab.

00:38:59.572 --> 00:39:16.697
And as Puggy said, outpatient services for months and years is actually probably still beneficial because even though you might see the most rapid changes occurring early on if you're still, pushing yourself and and, trying to get extra benefit, then, these patients will continue to improve over time.

00:39:17.802 --> 00:39:20.362
Yeah, it was lovely hearing that from Puggy as well.

00:39:21.032 --> 00:39:21.268
So.

00:39:21.387 --> 00:39:22.538
it's been brilliant speaking to you.

00:39:22.538 --> 00:39:23.918
It's been a really interesting.

00:39:23.918 --> 00:39:25.737
I always love every podcast I do.

00:39:25.737 --> 00:39:29.027
I go, this is the best one ever, but this has been brilliant hearing all this.

00:39:29.038 --> 00:39:33.708
So it's really, I really appreciate your time and amazing work you're doing.

00:39:34.217 --> 00:39:43.708
I'd like to thank you, Michael, for coming on our podcast and putting your time towards this and also all the efforts you're doing in that South Australia for this and covering Northern Territory.

00:39:43.708 --> 00:39:45.418
So thank you very much for all your hard work.

00:39:46.672 --> 00:39:46.992
thanks.

00:39:47.052 --> 00:39:47.702

Michael Waters

Interventional Neurologist

Michael is a Neurologist at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Following Neurology training, he completed three fellowship years in Interventional Neuroradiology, both in Australia and the USA.
He works as a Stroke Neurologist, and Neurointerventionist, providing minimally invasive, endovascular treatment for stroke, cerebral aneurysms, and other neurovascular diseases.

Exploring Stroke Detection and Management with Interventional Neurologist Dr. Michael Waters

Michael Waters

New to Aussie Med Ed- Podcast?